LINE

Text:AAAPrint
Voices

U.S. overconfidence led to the trade war

1
2019-06-18 09:16:41China Daily Editor : Mo Hong'e ECNS App Download

By increasing the tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese goods from 10 percent to 25 percent, the United States has launched a trade war against China. Worse, the U.S. claims China provoked the trade war by insisting on a substantially rewritten draft agreement, which according to the U.S. reneged on previously agreed terms, which is not true. Instead, no agreement could be reached between the two sides despite the many rounds of negotiations because of the hard stance the U.S. had adopted.

In my view, the U.S. failed to anticipate three outcomes of the trade frictions and the unsuccessful trade talks.

First, China's determination to defend its core interests has exceeded U.S. expectations. While serving as a senior government official, I have participated in many bilateral and multilateral negotiations. And experience tells me that a good agreement is that which respects both sides' core interests and major concerns, and satisfies them to the greatest extent. It is difficult to implement an agreement that satisfies one party and disappoints the other.

Since the U.S. has gone too far, directly infringing on China's core interests, China cannot sit idle. In the last round of trade talks, the Chinese delegation stuck to its bottom line, demanding a respectful and equal agreement. It is this determination that the U.S. failed to anticipate.

Second, the U.S. failed to appreciate China's ability to resist U.S. pressure. When it comes to overall bilateral relations, China has dealt with the U.S. with sincerity, hoping to resolve their disputes through negotiations. But the U.S. mistook this as China's weakness and chose to exert "extreme pressure" in the negotiations, which China had to resist.

The U.S. might have assumed that just like other countries, which could not withstand its "extreme pressure", China also would make concessions. But China has not only overcome the U.S. pressure but also is prepared for any possible consequences of the trade war. The U.S. did not expect this level of resilience from China.

And third, during the last round of trade talks, the U.S. did not withdraw the tariffs it had imposed on Chinese goods earlier and, instead, increased them. The fact that U.S. consumers, importers and trade lobbies-not to mention the global business community-have all criticized the U.S. for hiking the tariffs was also beyond the expectation of U.S. policymakers. They didn't expect the trade war to cause turbulence in the U.S. stock market either. I believe that in the coming months, the opposition of U.S. consumers and businesses to these tariffs will grow stronger, forcing the U.S. administration to reconsider its position.

The root cause of the U.S.' failure to understand China is its failure to evaluate China's achievements in the four decades of reform and opening-up. American policymakers still claim that it is the U.S. that has fueled China's growth since the 1980s, as if its achievements are not the fruits of its people's labor but gifts from the U.S.. Also, they wrongly believe that China cannot do without the U.S. and therefore will welcome the punches it delivers without even thinking of hitting back.

China has not buckled under U.S. pressure because its economic foundations are strong and economic growth is sustainable. China may suffer some losses in the short term, but in the medium and long term it will overcome the difficulties to achieve greater development.

The short-term improvement of the U.S. economy and introduction of some new economic policies could have misled Washington into believing that the U.S. is "winning" the trade war. In fact, the short-term improvement of the U.S. economy is the immediate effect of the tax cut policy, whose impact will gradually disappear over time.

Yet we should look at the outcome of Sino-U.S. negotiations rationally. The relationship between China and the U.S. has not become one of full-scale confrontation, as some experts and scholars have suggested.

Although the U.S. has shifted its policy from the earlier engagement and containment of China to an all-out suppression of China, no country can stop the global trend of development. The shift in economic power to the East will continue. And China's huge and consumer market will continue to grow. If the U.S. chooses to exit such a market, no amount of tariffs can compensate for the losses it would suffer. Therefore, U.S. companies will continue to operate in the Chinese market, and the trend of overall cooperation between China and the U.S. will not change in the long run.

Cooperation is the only way Sino-U.S. relations can improve. China does not want the trade war to continue nor do most Americans. So we must remain cool-headed and identify the general direction of win-win cooperation between China and the U.S.. And Beijing and Washington should avoid confrontation, meet each other halfway, and handle trade and bilateral relations with mutual respect and equality.

The author is former vice-minister of commerce. The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

Related news

MorePhoto

Most popular in 24h

MoreTop news

MoreVideo

News
Politics
Business
Society
Culture
Military
Sci-tech
Entertainment
Sports
Odd
Features
Biz
Economy
Travel
Travel News
Travel Types
Events
Food
Hotel
Bar & Club
Architecture
Gallery
Photo
CNS Photo
Video
Video
Learning Chinese
Learn About China
Social Chinese
Business Chinese
Buzz Words
Bilingual
Resources
ECNS Wire
Special Coverage
Infographics
Voices
LINE
Back to top Links | About Us | Jobs | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Copyright ©1999-2019 Chinanews.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
广西福彩快乐双彩